Why are songs in most Bollywood movies absent from Hollywood?
If you watch Bollywood and Hollywood movies, you will inevitably notice many differences in story, plot, script, dialogue, and acting; for example, in Indian films, you will find songs, dances, and colours in most of their works, on the other hand, you do not find that in American films except for musical ones, why bollywood karaoke songs ?
If we look at the Hollywood films presented bollywood karaoke songs in the fifties and sixties of the last century, there were a lot of songs, but Hollywood largely abandoned the introduction of a mandatory song in its summer films, with the exception of family films in the works presented in the nineties. As for Indian films, songs are at their core, which is why they have been reviewed by Indian art sites.
learn to sing bollywood songs online ?
Songs in Hollywood movies bollywood karaoke songs there was a close relationship between pop music and American films in the fifties and sixties, and songs were an essential part of films. According to the American magazine “The Atlantic”, the songs of films with soundtracks bollywood karaoke songs, which are shown at the Broadway Theater in New York City, were among the best-selling albums in the United States between 1957 and 1964, and cinema played an important role in the fame of songs in that period and until the eighties, as the big screen was credited with the arrival of songs to the list of “Top 40 songs” Despite the shrinking range of music and songs in films during the nineties, some movie songs were gaining record views, for example, Whitney Houston’s “I Will Always Love You” song in the film “The Bodyguard”, achieved amazing numbers at the time, as the song broke the record and remained in the first place on the “Billboard Hot 100” list for 14 consecutive weeks, and became the best-selling song sung by a woman in the United States. It also achieved global success when it topped the charts in almost every country, selling 20 million copies, and becoming the best-selling single of all time sung by a soloist, thanks to which Houston won the Grammy Award for Best Record in 1994 bollywood karaoke songs.
karaoke bollywood songs ?
But by the early 2000s, the musical presence in films was steadily shrinking, while pop and hip-hop music began to gain more popularity and attract the interest of teenagers and young adults. Films no longer produce musical works of interest to this younger segment, so films compete with musical works in the song market, The music market has led to younger artists, and the music industry has a larger commercial market thanks to sales of low-priced albums and a large young audience .After that, most American films gave up including a mandatory song in their films, especially summer ones, which have a high audience. But some family films still feature songs in their works. However, there are films that offer songs but to a very small extent bollywood karaoke songs.
karaoke bollywood songs with lyrics ?
Songs in Bollywood moviesFor Indian cinema, songs are an essential part of their films. According to Eat My News, the first birth of the song in Indian films came with the first Indian sound film in 1931, and over the next nine years, India produced 931 feature films, containing songs with an average of 10 songs per film.At first, poetry and songs were used in movies to attract viewers. Watching music and dance performances in theatres was a way of life in India during the 20th century, with many couples and families going to the theatre to enjoy a musical performance, and this continued until songs and music became an essential part of the film.In the thirties of the last century, a large number of actors and actresses sang their own songs in films, so the choice of actors depended on their singing and show abilities, such as the singer Bal Gandharva and Babora Bindharkar, and the songs had to be recorded during the filming of the film.
Unlike Hollywood, songs have evolved in Indian cinema to the point where it is rare to find an Indian film without songs and dances. British-Asian magazine DESIblitz explored why the song is a rooted part of Indian films. She saw it as an alternative to intimate scenes in one form or another, as Indian society does not accept these scenes in his works. To compensate for her absence, songs are used to add excitement.Although 21st-century films have become more liberal, they have not dispensed with the existence of songs. Also, because the songs form a close connection to the viewers, especially with motivational or sad songs that are designed for them shows and dances commensurate with the emotional state of the film, these songs have become a public demand that Indian film viewers are waiting for.
In addition, there is a commercial reason behind the proliferation of songs within Indian films, so that music and songs are often released before the film reaches the big screen because this early release of music and songs helps filmmakers promote and attract attention to their next film, thus making profits. The more popular the song is, the greater the overall revenue of the film, and some songs are even more successful than the films in which they were shown.Songs can attract a larger audience than their films, as they can become an essential part of weddings and celebrations, and viewers seek to imitate the dances and performances performed by the protagonists. For example, Teri Meri’s 2011 film Bodyguard was a smash hit, with the song having exceeded 228 million views, despite the fact that the film itself achieved a poor rating on IMDb, scoring only 4.7 out of 10 audience ratings.
Bollywood star Kangana Ranuth’s Twitter account has been reactivated after being banned from the platform for two years for violating the social media site’s policy on anti-hate speech.The 35-year-old Indian actress joins thousands of people who, including former US President Donald Trump, were able to return to Twitter after billionaire Elon Musk took over the platform last October.“Hi everyone, it’s good to be back on stage,” Ranaut tweeted on Tuesday, before releasing a series of tweets criticising the Indian film industry, calling it “obsessed with money.”The actress, who won two awards for her roles in Queen in 2014 and Tano Weds Manu Returns in 2015, has stirred controversy several times.
In May 2021, she was banned from using her Twitter account after calling Mamata Banerjee, an opposition figure to Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whom the actress shows great support, a “monster”.Kangana Ranaut has also attacked singer Rihanna after the latter tweeted about large protests by farmers in India, calling the pop star “foolish” and farmers “terrorists”.(AFP)Jordan’s King Ratifies ‘Cybercrime’ Law
Jordan’s King Abdullah II on Saturday approved six draft laws, including the cybercrime law, which sparked widespread controversy in the country recently, over the “severe penalties” contained in it.The law, which increased many penalties for cybercrime, will come into force 30 days after its publication in the Official Gazette, as it has completed all legislative stages.The law has drawn widespread criticism from international human rights organizations and Jordanian civil society organizations, as it tightens restrictions on public freedoms, specifically freedom of expression.
Prime Minister Bisher al-Khasawneh said during the National Assembly’s discussions of the law that the government “does not see that the draft cybercrime law detracts from the essence of freedoms and does not prejudice the constitution,” adding that the government is “completely open to any manifestations of criticism.” According to al-Khasawneh, “What is new in the law is the regulation and determination of penalties in cyberspace, and the government does not provide anything that violates the constitution.”Among the most prominent amendments that faced objection from human rights civil society organizations and journalists, the law stipulates that “anyone who intentionally sends, re-sends, or publishes data or information, through the information network, information technology, information system, website, or social media platforms, involving false news, defamation, slander or insult to any person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a period of no less than three months, or a fine of not less than 5,000 dinars ($7,000). dinars and not more than 20,000 dinars ($28,000), or both of these penalties.”
Crimes are prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor’s Office, “without the need to file a complaint or claim of personal right if they are addressed to an authority in the State, official bodies or public administrations, or to one of its members, or to any public official in the course of his or her duties.”The law also punishes anyone who rumors, attributes or intentionally attributes unlawfully to a person or contributes to this through the computer network, information technology, information system, website, or social media platforms, acts that may assassinate his personality, by imprisonment for a period of no less than three months, or a fine of not less than 5,000 dinars ($7,000) and not more than 20,000 dinars ($28,000). or both of these penalties.”
Anyone who intentionally uses the information network, information technology, information system, website, or social media platform to publish sedition or strife, targets societal peace, incites hatred, calls for violence, justifies it, or contempt for religions shall be punished by imprisonment from one to three years, or a fine of not less than 5,000 dinars ($7,000) and not more than 20,000 dinars ($28,000). or both.”The above penalties also apply to “anyone who intentionally publishes or republishes false news in cyberspace that targets national security and societal peace or defames, defames or insults any person.”
In this context, the Jordanian Civil Society Organizations Coordination Committee (Himmam) expressed concern in a statement on Saturday evening about the recent judicial rulings imposing custodial penalties on journalists as a result of their posts on social media platforms, the latest of which was Ahmed Hassan Al-Zu’bi, who was sentenced to one year in prison with a fine, on charges of defaming an official body.“Himam” stressed that freedom of expression “is a fundamental value that must be protected and respected,” and that “the Jordanian constitution guarantees freedom of expression in Article 15 thereof.” “Himmam” considered that the use of the cybercrime law to impose harsh and custodial penalties against journalists “is contrary to the essence of constitutional protection,” and called for a reconsideration of “in generalities that allow their use to expand in violation of international human rights standards.”
participation of individuals and expressing their criticism of government performance or public policies,” she said.The coincidence of these sentences against journalists and activists with the prevailing debate over the adoption of the new cybercrime law “is a paradox that shows that the law can indeed be used to restrict freedom of expression and media, and to immunize the government from criticism, contrary to what the law’s defenders have reported”, she said.
Under its umbrella, Himmam includes 11 civil society organizations working in various fields, namely: the Phenage Center for Economic and Informatics Studies, the Justice Center for Legal Aid, the Center for the Protection and Freedom of Journalists, the Adalah Center for Human Rights Studies, the Tamkeen Center for Legal Aid and Human Rights, the Community Media Network, the Rashid Center for Integrity and Transparency (Transparency International), the Arab Women Association, the Jordanian Partners, Ahl, and the Sadaqa Foundation.At the same time, the National Society for Human Rights also issued a statement on the issuance of judicial rulings in the past few days against a group of journalists and activists, including Al-Zoubi and Dr. Ibrahim Al-Mansi and journalist Heba Abu Taha.
authority, in light of laws and legislation that the legal and human rights community considers contrary to the system of human rights and constitutional rights.”She wondered: “What will be the situation when the new cybercrime law comes into force, and its expansion in the circle of criminalization and harsher penalties, in addition to the broad texts and definitions and the restrictive powers of the judge in decisions?”
She appealed to the judicial, executive, human rights, and Jordanian Bar Association authorities to address the Minister of Justice to ask the Chief Prosecutor to submit the files of cases related to citizens to the Court of Cassation because the judgments issued have acquired the final degree and the Court of Cassation has not previously scrutinised them.In a previous statement, IPI called the cybercrime bill “a blow to press freedom in Jordan” and warned against “the authorities misusing it to target journalists and critics.”
The coordinating committee demanding the withdrawal of the draft cybercrime law, which includes parties and civil society institutions, announced the continuation of its protest activities until the law is repealed or made substantial amendments to it.At the end of last month, the US State Department criticised the law, which it considered “would impede future investment in the technology sector, and undermine economic and political reform efforts,” describing its provisions as vague bollywood karaoke songs.